If you received IRS Letter 6174 about cryptocurrency, you are not alone, and the timing is not random. The IRS has restarted and expanded these digital-asset compliance letters, and recipients are reaching out with the same worry: what does this letter actually mean, and do I have to do something? This guide explains Letter 6174, how it differs from the related 6174-A and 6173 letters and a CP2000 notice, why the IRS is sending them again, and the options in front of you. Throughout, the honest bottom line is the same: a letter that requires no response can still be a warning worth taking seriously.

What is IRS Letter 6174?

Letter 6174 is the mildest of the IRS cryptocurrency compliance letters. It is educational in tone. The IRS is telling you that it received information, typically from a cryptocurrency exchange, indicating you hold or transact in digital assets, and it is reminding you of the rules for reporting virtual-currency transactions. The letter does not accuse you of anything and does not demand a reply. In practice, it is best understood as a signal: the IRS knows, and it is inviting voluntary compliance before taking a harder look.

Letter 6174 vs. 6174-A vs. 6173 vs. CP2000

The four notices crypto holders most often confuse sit on a ladder of seriousness. The table below shows where Letter 6174 falls and what separates it from the others.

Does Letter 6174 require a response?

No. Unlike Letter 6173, which generally calls for a response within about 30 days, and unlike a CP2000, which carries a hard deadline, Letter 6174 asks for nothing. You can set it down and do nothing, and you will not have missed a deadline. The real question is not whether a response is required. It is whether your past crypto reporting was correct. If it was, the letter can be filed away. If it was not, the absence of a deadline is a window, not a dismissal, and that window does not stay open forever.

Why is the IRS sending Letter 6174 again?

The IRS sent a large batch of these letters in 2019, then went quiet. They are back, and the reason is data. Cryptocurrency exchange reporting has expanded sharply, the new Form 1099-DA brings digital-asset transactions into routine information reporting, and the IRS has continued to obtain customer records from major exchanges through John Doe summonses and other requests. The agency now has far more third-party information to match against filed returns, and letters like 6174 are how it puts taxpayers on notice that a mismatch may exist. In short, the letters are rising again because the IRS can finally see more of the picture.

What Letter 6174 means for your situation

The right next step depends entirely on your facts. A few common patterns capture most recipients.

You reported your crypto correctly

If you reported your taxable crypto activity accurately in the years at issue, Letter 6174 may genuinely call for no action. It can still be worth a short privileged review to confirm there are no gaps you are not aware of, especially across multiple years or multiple exchanges.

You have unreported crypto from prior years

Many recipients traded on an exchange years ago and never reported it, sometimes because they did not realize a sale was reportable. If that describes you, the letter is a prompt to come into compliance on your terms rather than the government’s. Depending on the facts, that can mean amended returns or a formal voluntary disclosure, and the choice is a legal one that turns on whether the earlier underreporting could be viewed as willful.

You sold at a loss and assumed you did not have to report

A very common and costly misunderstanding is that selling cryptocurrency at an overall loss means there was nothing to report. A sale or exchange of crypto is a reportable disposition whether you gained or lost, and an unreported disposition is exactly the kind of gap that produces a 6174 letter. The good news is that an overall loss often means little or no tax was actually due, so fixing the reporting is frequently less painful than people fear.

You lost crypto to a scam or theft

If you lost cryptocurrency in a phishing scam, a fraudulent platform, or a “pig butchering” scheme, you may have a theft-loss issue layered on top of the letter, and a potential deduction worth real money if it is handled correctly. The federal and California treatment of these losses is technical and fact-specific. See how to claim a crypto theft-loss deduction.

Crypto on foreign exchanges adds a second layer

If your digital assets sat on a non-U.S. exchange or in offshore wallets, a crypto letter can sit on top of separate foreign-reporting duties, including the FBAR and related forms. Those rules carry their own penalties and their own compliance paths, so they need to be addressed together rather than in isolation. Our cryptocurrency accounting and audits practice handles the crypto and foreign-reporting sides as one problem.

What you should not do

Do not ignore the letter if you know your prior reporting was incomplete, and do not rush to amend on your own without understanding whether the conduct could be viewed as willful. A hurried “quiet” amendment can, in the wrong case, create a record the government later uses. The safest first move is a privileged conversation with a tax attorney, because only an attorney can assess your exposure under attorney-client privilege before anything is filed.

How Kugelman Law helps

We advise cryptocurrency holders who receive IRS compliance letters and represent them across the full range of responses, from confirming that no action is needed to amended returns, voluntary disclosure, and audit defense if a matter escalates. Every engagement starts with a privileged assessment of exposure. For matters that reach into IRS examinations, former IRS Revenue Agent Otto Bosch leads the firm’s federal audit-defense work, and you can read how a former agent approaches crypto tax audit defense.

Our results reflect what disciplined advocacy achieves in high-stakes tax disputes. In one federal matter, two IRS Notices of Deficiency proposing more than $557,000 across six years were settled in U.S. Tax Court down to roughly $38,000, and with avoided interest and California exposure the client effectively saved over $1.2 million. Results depend on specific facts. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes.

Talk to a crypto tax attorney about your Letter 6174

If you received IRS Letter 6174 and are not certain your prior crypto reporting was complete, get a privileged assessment before you decide anything. Schedule a paid, privileged consultation with Kugelman Law by calling (415) 968-1780 or visiting our contact page.

Frequently asked questions

Is IRS Letter 6174 an audit?

No. Letter 6174 is an educational compliance letter, not an audit and not a bill. It signals that the IRS has information about your cryptocurrency activity and wants to be sure you reported it correctly. It can, however, be a step on the path toward an examination if a real reporting gap exists and goes unaddressed.

Do I have to respond to Letter 6174?

No response is required. That is what separates it from Letter 6173, which generally requires a response within about 30 days, and from a CP2000, which has a firm deadline. The absence of a required response does not mean the letter is meaningless; it means you have an opportunity to fix any prior-year problem on your own timeline.

What happens if I ignore Letter 6174?

If your reporting was accurate, ignoring it may carry no consequence. If your reporting was not accurate, ignoring it does not make the issue go away. The IRS already has the underlying data, and the matter can escalate to a 6173 letter, a CP2000, or an audit. It is far better to address a known gap while you still control the timing.

Why did I get Letter 6174 if I only sold crypto at a loss?

Because a sale is reportable even when you lose money. The IRS received information that you disposed of cryptocurrency, and if that disposition was not reported, the data does not match your return, regardless of whether the result was a gain or a loss. Correcting the reporting is usually straightforward, and an overall loss often means little or no additional tax.

Should I amend my tax returns after getting Letter 6174?

Possibly, but that is a legal decision, not a bookkeeping one. For genuinely honest mistakes, amended returns may be the right fix. If there is any chance the earlier conduct could be seen as willful, a bare amendment can backfire, and a formal path may fit better. Have the exposure assessed under privilege before you file.

Can the IRS see my Coinbase or other exchange history?

Increasingly, yes. Through expanded exchange reporting, Form 1099-DA, and summonses served on major exchanges, the IRS has obtained large volumes of customer transaction data. Assume the IRS can see more of your history than you expect, and reconstruct your own records accordingly.

About the author

Alex Kugelman is the founder and managing attorney of Kugelman Law and is nationally recognized for cryptocurrency tax. He has spoken on digital-asset tax and IRS enforcement on the Bitcoin.tax podcast and The Mark Milton Show. With nearly two decades of federal tax controversy experience, he is admitted in California and before the U.S. Supreme Court, the U.S. Tax Court, and the U.S. District Court for the Northern and Eastern Districts of California, and served as San Francisco Chair of the Federal Bar Association Tax Division in 2018. For matters that reach into IRS examinations, his colleague Otto Bosch, a former IRS Revenue Agent from the Global High Wealth group, leads the firm’s federal audit-defense work.

This article is attorney advertising and general information, not legal advice. Whether a given letter requires action, and which compliance path fits, are fact-specific legal determinations. Contacting Kugelman Law does not create an attorney-client relationship.

{
“@context”: “https://schema.org”,
“@graph”: [
{
“@type”: “LegalService”,
“@id”: “https://www.kugelmanlaw.com/los-angeles-tax-attorney/#legalservice”,
“name”: “Kugelman Law”,
“url”: “https://www.kugelmanlaw.com/los-angeles-tax-attorney/”,
“telephone”: “+1-415-968-1780”,
“image”: “/static/2025/08/logo-image.png”,
“logo”: “/static/2025/08/logo-image.png”,
“address”: {
“@type”: “PostalAddress”,
“streetAddress”: “633 West Fifth Street, 28th Floor”,
“addressLocality”: “Los Angeles”,
“addressRegion”: “CA”,
“postalCode”: “90071”,
“addressCountry”: “US”
},
“areaServed”: [
{ “@type”: “State”, “name”: “California” },
{ “@type”: “Country”, “name”: “United States” }
],
“knowsAbout”: [
“Cryptocurrency tax”,
“IRS Letter 6174”,
“IRS digital-asset enforcement”,
“Unreported cryptocurrency income”,
“Cryptocurrency tax audits”,
“FBAR and offshore reporting”
]
},
{
“@type”: “Attorney”,
“@id”: “https://www.kugelmanlaw.com/our-team/alex-kugelman/#attorney”,
“name”: “Alex Kugelman”,
“jobTitle”: “Founder and Managing Attorney”,
“url”: “https://www.kugelmanlaw.com/our-team/alex-kugelman/”,
“worksFor”: { “@id”: “https://www.kugelmanlaw.com/los-angeles-tax-attorney/#legalservice” },
“alumniOf”: “Chapman University Fowler School of Law”,
“knowsAbout”: [
“Cryptocurrency tax”,
“IRS Letter 6174”,
“IRS digital-asset enforcement”,
“Federal tax controversy”,
“U.S. Tax Court litigation”
],
“sameAs”: [
“https://www.kugelmanlaw.com/our-team/alex-kugelman/”,
“https://www.linkedin.com/in/loakcrypto/”,
“https://lawyers.justia.com/lawyer/alexander-kugelman-1530480”
],
“subjectOf”: [
{
“@type”: “CreativeWork”,
“name”: “Bitcoin.tax podcast: Alex Kugelman on cryptocurrency tax and IRS digital-asset enforcement”,
“publisher”: { “@type”: “Organization”, “name”: “Bitcoin.tax” }
},
{
“@type”: “CreativeWork”,
“name”: “The Mark Milton Show: Alex Kugelman on cryptocurrency tax”,
“publisher”: { “@type”: “Organization”, “name”: “The Mark Milton Show” }
}
]
},
{
“@type”: “Article”,
“@id”: “https://www.kugelmanlaw.com/blog/irs-crypto-letter-6173-6174-6174a/#article”,
“headline”: “IRS Letter 6174 (Crypto): What It Means and What to Do”,
“description”: “A California tax attorney explains IRS Letter 6174 for cryptocurrency: what it means, whether you must respond, how it differs from 6174-A, 6173, and CP2000, and your options before the IRS escalates.”,
“author”: { “@id”: “https://www.kugelmanlaw.com/our-team/alex-kugelman/#attorney” },
“publisher”: { “@id”: “https://www.kugelmanlaw.com/los-angeles-tax-attorney/#legalservice” },
“datePublished”: “2026-05-08”,
“dateModified”: “2026-10-02”,
“articleSection”: “Crypto Taxes”,
“keywords”: “IRS Letter 6174, IRS crypto letter, letter 6174 cryptocurrency, 6174 vs 6173, crypto voluntary disclosure”,
“mainEntityOfPage”: {
“@type”: “WebPage”,
“@id”: “https://www.kugelmanlaw.com/blog/irs-crypto-letter-6173-6174-6174a/”
}
},
{
“@type”: “FAQPage”,
“@id”: “https://www.kugelmanlaw.com/blog/irs-crypto-letter-6173-6174-6174a/#faq”,
“mainEntity”: [
{
“@type”: “Question”,
“name”: “Is IRS Letter 6174 an audit?”,
“acceptedAnswer”: {
“@type”: “Answer”,
“text”: “No. Letter 6174 is an educational compliance letter, not an audit and not a bill. It signals that the IRS has information about your cryptocurrency activity and wants to be sure you reported it correctly. It can, however, be a step on the path toward an examination if a real reporting gap exists and goes unaddressed.”
}
},
{
“@type”: “Question”,
“name”: “Do I have to respond to Letter 6174?”,
“acceptedAnswer”: {
“@type”: “Answer”,
“text”: “No response is required. That is what separates it from Letter 6173, which generally requires a response within about 30 days, and from a CP2000, which has a firm deadline. The absence of a required response does not mean the letter is meaningless; it means you have an opportunity to fix any prior-year problem on your own timeline.”
}
},
{
“@type”: “Question”,
“name”: “What happens if I ignore Letter 6174?”,
“acceptedAnswer”: {
“@type”: “Answer”,
“text”: “If your reporting was accurate, ignoring it may carry no consequence. If your reporting was not accurate, ignoring it does not make the issue go away. The IRS already has the underlying data, and the matter can escalate to a 6173 letter, a CP2000, or an audit. It is far better to address a known gap while you still control the timing.”
}
},
{
“@type”: “Question”,
“name”: “Why did I get Letter 6174 if I only sold crypto at a loss?”,
“acceptedAnswer”: {
“@type”: “Answer”,
“text”: “Because a sale is reportable even when you lose money. The IRS received information that you disposed of cryptocurrency, and if that disposition was not reported, the data does not match your return, regardless of whether the result was a gain or a loss. Correcting the reporting is usually straightforward, and an overall loss often means little or no additional tax.”
}
},
{
“@type”: “Question”,
“name”: “Should I amend my tax returns after getting Letter 6174?”,
“acceptedAnswer”: {
“@type”: “Answer”,
“text”: “Possibly, but that is a legal decision, not a bookkeeping one. For genuinely honest mistakes, amended returns may be the right fix. If there is any chance the earlier conduct could be seen as willful, a bare amendment can backfire, and a formal path may fit better. Have the exposure assessed under privilege before you file.”
}
},
{
“@type”: “Question”,
“name”: “Can the IRS see my Coinbase or other exchange history?”,
“acceptedAnswer”: {
“@type”: “Answer”,
“text”: “Increasingly, yes. Through expanded exchange reporting, Form 1099-DA, and summonses served on major exchanges, the IRS has obtained large volumes of customer transaction data. Assume the IRS can see more of your history than you expect, and reconstruct your own records accordingly.”
}
}
]
}
]
}